Author-choice open-access publishing in the biological and medical literature: A citation analysis
| dc.contributor.author | Davis, Philip M. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2008-12-12T18:59:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2008-12-12T18:59:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In this article, we analyze the citations to articles published in 11 biological and medical journals from 2003 to 2007 that employ author-choice open-access models. Controlling for known explanatory predictors of citations, only 2 of the 11 journals show positive and significant open-access effects. Analyzing all journals together, we report a small but significant increase in article citations of 17%. In addition, there is strong evidence to suggest that the open-access advantage is declining by about 7% per year, from 32% in 2004 to 11% in 2007. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology v.60 n.1 p.3-8 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1813/11647 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
| dc.subject | open access | en_US |
| dc.subject | author choice | en_US |
| dc.subject | citation analysis | en_US |
| dc.subject | bibliometrics | en_US |
| dc.title | Author-choice open-access publishing in the biological and medical literature: A citation analysis | en_US |
| dc.type | article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1